Kim vetoes ban on gene-modified taro, coffee
POSTED: Friday, October 31, 2008
HILO » Big Island Mayor Harry Kim vetoed a bill yesterday that would make it a criminal violation punishable by a $1,000 fine to research or grow genetically engineered coffee or taro on the Big Island.
The bill was passed 9-0 by the Hawaii County Council on Oct. 8, meaning there are more than enough votes to override the veto.
Kim cited two general concerns: that police cannot enforce such a law and that the world needs research on genetically modified crops to ensure food supplies.
“;How would the Police Department make a determination on which taro or coffee has been genetically engineered?”; Chief Lawrence Mahuna wrote to Kim. The department has no equipment or personnel who know how to test for genetically modified organisms, and no money to upgrade its capabilities, Mahuna said.
Kim added, “;There is global demand for new, improved, safe and dependable plant genetics, and Hawaii is a special place for research because of its location and its year-round growing environment.”;
Council Chairman Pete Hoffmann scoffed at both statements.
In the case of a violation, scientists would report anyone undertaking forbidden research, and police would act on that information, Hoffmann said.
Regarding research on other crops, the bill does not impose a ban on them, and there is no intention of widening the ban to include other crops, he said.
Such a widespread ban has been the fear of opponents of the bill. On Oct. 8 the Hawaii Island Chamber of Commerce testified, “;This bill is just the beginning of an anti-science agenda.”;
Hoffmann called such fears “;a bunch of nonsense.”;
He is looking into calling a special meeting of the Council to override the veto, since he anticipates public testimony would last all day, he said. Previous testimony was overwhelmingly in favor of the bill, he said.
Kim repeated a call for more public education about genetic modification, including the strict state and federal regulations it must meet.
Representatives of the Biotechnology Regulatory Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and from the state Department of Agriculture have offered to discuss these matters with the Council, Kim said.