— ADVERTISEMENT —
Starbulletin.com



Ruth Tschumy
Education Matters
Ruth Tschumy

Sunday, April 3, 2005





Act 51 treats principals
as heads of corporations

Turning principals into chief executive officers is the intent of several provisions in the Reinventing Education Act (Act 51). Does the "principal as CEO" analogy work?

It is difficult to imagine the CEO of a multimillion-dollar business working just 10 months each year. Yet, Hawaii's principals are on 10-month contracts. Act 51 mandates that principals be given 12-month work contracts, but because our principals are unionized, unlike business CEOs, this change must be negotiated between the Department of Education and the principals' union.

Like business CEOs, principals will be judged on their job performance and rewarded or sanctioned accordingly. A report on principal performance contracts is currently being reviewed by the Board of Education.

By 2006-'07, principals will be given three-year contracts, and the recommendation is that they will be evaluated annually on four professional standards, including school and instructional improvement and leadership; school learning climate and atmosphere; professionalism; and management of the full scope of school administrative responsibilities.

Each standard has a set of core and optional criteria, goals really, to help both the principal and his or her evaluator (complex area superintendent) monitor the degree to which the principal has been successful in meeting the standard. Goals for the first standard tend to deal with "increasing the percentage" of students who, for instance, are proficient in reading at a specific grade level, rather than including goals related to improvement in test scores, a more controversial measurement.

Incentives for principals who meet high performance levels are still under discussion, but one suggestion is a reward of $10,000 for the school and $5,000 for the principal. The DOE will expect principals to make a three-year commitment to a school.

If a principal's performance is marginal or unsatisfactory, the DOE may cancel the contract or take other employment action, including termination, similar to the kinds of action a mediocre CEOs stockholders or board might take.

Because Act 51 requires principals to assume expanded duties, including budgetary and fiscal management, the state DOE will provide assistance to principals and appropriate training through the Hawaii Principals Academy. Specific training modules will help principals (1)become better leaders, (2) improve student achievement, (3) collaborate with school community councils, (4) manage school budgets, (5) establish partnerships with the private sector, and (6) develop curriculum alignment.

What do principals think about these changes? In various DOE surveys, some welcome the changes, but others feel the CEO model is not applicable to school principals because CEOs have much more control. If principals are to be held accountable, they reason, then they must also be given full authority. Some say trust is an issue. They do not trust the system, and the system does not trust or respect them. Finally, some wonder if performance contracts, weighted student formula and other Act 51 provisions aren't just the "flavor of the month," here today but gone tomorrow. All agree that their work plates are already overflowing.

On a personal note, I have the highest respect for the approximately 260 public school principals who oversee the education of Hawaii's children. Thank you for your service.


Ruth Tschumy is a consultant to the Hawaii Educational Policy Center, a nonpartisan research organization.



| | | PRINTER-FRIENDLY VERSION
E-mail to Editorial Page Editor

BACK TO TOP



© Honolulu Star-Bulletin -- http://archives.starbulletin.com

— ADVERTISEMENT —
— ADVERTISEMENTS —


— ADVERTISEMENTS —