Editorials
Thursday, April 10, 1997

U.S. forces are still
needed in East Asia

IT'S been said many times before, but it's reassuring to read that the new secretary of defense, William Cohen, appreciates the importance of maintaining a strong U.S. military presence in East Asia. Cohen said in Tokyo that a sharp reduction in the 100,000 troops in the region could disrupt the military balance and set off an arms race among Asian countries.

Far from caving in to calls for withdrawal of U.S. forces from Okinawa, the secretary asserted that the 47,000 U.S. troops in Japan and the 37,000 in South Korea have a stabilizing effect and are appropriate "now and in the indefinite future."

Japan in particular would be faced with a need to build up its forces in the event of a U.S. pullout. The government of Prime Minister Ryutaro Hashimoto, like its predecessors, has supported a continued U.S. military presence and has taken steps to ensure that the Americans can stay on Okinawa despite strong local opposition.

The confrontation between the two Koreas continues to be a matter of concern, but the secretary said the U.S. military might have to stay on in the region even if Korea was reunited. The main reason was unstated but clear: China.

Cohen maintained that the American military contingents in East Asia are not directed against China, but that is more a matter of diplomatic correctness than reality. In fact, China's military buildup is worrying its neighbors and the Pentagon. The dispatch of two aircraft carrier groups to Taiwan last year when China was firing missiles near the island was a better indication of U.S. policy than verbal acrobatics.

This policy of continued engagement in East Asia has obvious implications for Hawaii. As long as the policy is maintained, Hawaii will retain its importance as the mid-Pacific support base for military operations in Asia.

Lands for OHA

THE newly re-elected chairman of the board of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs has ideas about ceded land that he says the state should turn over to OHA. But there are problems, in addition to the fact that the Admissions Act requires the state to use ceded lands for other purposes besides the welfare of native Hawaiians.

Affirmative action

CALIFORNIA voters' decision last November to ban the use of racial and sexual preferences in affirmative-action programs is forcing proponents of those programs to regroup. Although the court battle over the constitutionality of Proposition 209 is far from over, even President Clinton says it is time to reassess the emotion-packed issues involved.

The ban on hazing

IF hazing is an initiation that "endangers the physical or mental health of any student," it of course should be banned, as the state Board of Education has just reaffirmed. But hazing can be harmless, and the harmless varieties should be tolerated.




Published by Liberty Newspapers Limited Partnership

Rupert E. Phillips, CEO


John M. Flanagan, Editor & Publisher


David Shapiro, Managing Editor


Diane Yukihiro Chang, Senior Editor & Editorial Page Editor


Frank Bridgewater & Michael Rovner, Assistant Managing Editors


A.A. Smyser, Contributing Editor




Text Site Directory:
[News] [Business] [Features] [Sports] [Editorial] [Community]
[Info] [Letter to Editor] [Stylebook] [Feedback]



© 1997 Honolulu Star-Bulletin
http://starbulletin.com