Editorials
Wednesday, April 9, 1997

Senate budget is
too stingy on welfare

PLANNING the state government's budget at a time of fiscal stringency is not a pleasant task. Reflexive complaints by administration officials about legislative cuts in their funding proposals should be taken with a grain of salt.

Still, the budget as approved by the Senate yesterday seems unnecessarily Draconian with respect to welfare recipients -- the neediest of Hawaii's people. The Senate would cut 94 positions and $185 million from the Department of Human Services. The department's request would be reduced by 11 percent in the first year of the biennium and 19 percent in the second year, with most of the $65 million cut coming out of Medicaid and other welfare programs.

Kate Stanley, the department's deputy director, said it would have to ask the Legislature for emergency appropriations before the biennium ended. But state law bars the administration from seeking an emergency appropriation for general assistance recipients -- about 6,000 single disabled persons.

They could end up receiving just $150 a month -- which would amount to throwing them out on the street, as one advocate noted. That is not an acceptable situation. There are other ways to keep state spending within bounds, other programs that can be cut with less pain.

Ways and Means co-chairwoman Lehua Fernandes Salling explains that the Senate wants appropriations to closely match expenditures rather than accept a department's projected expenses for two years. This means close scrutiny of second-year requests, she says. But this virtually nullifies the concept of biennial budgeting and fosters the illusion that more money can be cut than is really the case.

The policy is particularly absurd as applied to the Hawaii Visitors and Convention Bureau, for which no funds are budgeted for the second year. That's ridiculous. Everyone knows the state will have to provide funds.

Reform in Pakistan

FOUR times in the last nine years elected governments of Pakistan have been dismissed by edict of the president. Now the powers of the president have been curtailed and the supremacy of parliament restored. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, victorious two months ago over rival Benazir Bhutto in parliamentary elections, instituted the change and both houses of parliament immediately approved.

Value of TV airwaves

THE issuance of new licenses to television broadcasters this month is being called the biggest government giveaway of the century. Second channels to be given to existing television stations for transmission of digital signals and other possible uses have been estimated to be worth $70 billion -- an amount equal to about 60 percent of this year's federal budget deficit. The question is what, if anything, will be offered in exchange.




Published by Liberty Newspapers Limited Partnership

Rupert E. Phillips, CEO


John M. Flanagan, Editor & Publisher


David Shapiro, Managing Editor


Diane Yukihiro Chang, Senior Editor & Editorial Page Editor


Frank Bridgewater & Michael Rovner, Assistant Managing Editors


A.A. Smyser, Contributing Editor




Text Site Directory:
[News] [Business] [Features] [Sports] [Editorial] [Community]
[Info] [Letter to Editor] [Stylebook] [Feedback]



© 1997 Honolulu Star-Bulletin
http://starbulletin.com