Last month, Circuit Judge Kevin Chang rejected the state attorney general's arguments against legalizing same-sex marriage. The issue is now headed to the state Supreme Court, which is expected to uphold Chang's ruling. The high court in 1993 compared the ban on homosexuals marrying to the former prohibition against interracial weddings.
In response, a jittery state House gave preliminary approval this week to a constitutional amendment restricting marriage to heterosexuals. A companion bill that's in the works would extend partnership rights to gays for hospital visitation, health decisions, property and inheritance. If the full Legislature approves the proposed constitutional amendment, the issue would be put to Hawaii voters.
Even if voters approve such an amendment, which is likely, don't look for the story to end there. Proponents of same-sex marriage are sure to challenge the amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court as violating the U.S. Constitution. If the federal high court agrees with Hawaii's high court - and the two constitutions are similar with respect to civil rights - it could, in effect, legalize same-sex marriage nationwide. A federal constitutional amendment must then be approved by three-fourths of state legislatures.
Those are a lot of ifs, but Chief Justice Moon was correct in saying legislators have the power to begin the process of amending the Constitution. Hawaii's Supreme Court lacks that coveted trump card.



Rupert E. Phillips, CEO


John M. Flanagan, Editor & Publisher


David Shapiro, Managing Editor


Diane Yukihiro Chang, Senior Editor & Editorial Page Editor


Frank Bridgewater & Michael Rovner, Assistant Managing Editors


A.A. Smyser, Contributing Editor