In Washington, State Department spokesman Nicholas Burns urged Burma to punish those responsible for the mob attack and "take every possible means to assure the safety of Aung San Suu Kyi." He added, "The United States is outraged by this attack, which took place under circumstances which are, to say the least, extremely disturbing."
The criticism was both timely and fully deserved. Suu Kyi, the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize winner, had been under house arrest for six years until her release in July 1995. Her political activities have continued to be severely restricted since her release. The attack was an obvious attempt to intimidate her.
However, the Clinton administration has been more restrained in its criticism of another repressive Asian government - Indonesia. Under reporters' questioning, President Clinton has been forced to deny that his relationship with Indonesian business executive James Riady had influenced his administration's policy toward Indonesia.
Human rights advocates have charged that the White House backed away from a review of Indonesian trade preferences that had been initiated to protest mistreatment of labor unions. Indonesian repression of East Timor has attracted scant criticism from a succession of U.S. administrations.
The award of this year's Nobel Peace Prize to two leaders of the East Timor resistance to Indonesian rule has called attention to Jakarta's abuses. Indonesia has more strategic and economic importance for the U.S. than Burma, but Washington cannot continue to ignore Jakarta's repressive policies in East Timor and other parts of the archipelago while scolding Burma.

Rupert E. Phillips, CEO
John M. Flanagan, Editor & Publisher
David Shapiro, Managing Editor
Diane Yukihiro Chang, Senior Editor & Editorial Page Editor
Frank Bridgewater & Michael Rovner, Assistant Managing Editors
A.A. Smyser, Contributing Editor