The phones have been jangling at a toll-free telephone hotline, which is fielding complaints about treatment of female service members at Army installations, especially Aberdeen. Last weekend, investigators at the 94-year-old training center were checking into more than 100 new reports of sexual misconduct in the military.
Already, the defenders of the status quo are worrying that "innocent soldiers will be caught up in the scandal and their careers will be ruined," according to a Los Angeles Times report. But even consensual relationships between superiors and trainees violate the military's strict ban against fraternization, and rightly so.
Like a liaison between a student and professor, the lines between those who have power over those who don't must not be overstepped. At the very least, it conveys the appearance of misuse of authority; on the other extreme, it results in unwanted sexual advances and intimidation.
Previously it was the Navy that bore the brunt of scrutinization over sexual misconduct between service personnel, particularly in the notorious Tailhook convention. Now the Army joins the Navy in probes into the sexual conduct - or misconduct - of its personnel.
Aberdeen's commander, Maj. Gen. Robert Shadley, who announced the criminal charges, has vowed to get to the bottom of the allegations. Interest on just how deep that "bottom" is will keep the media spotlight trained on Aberdeen and other military establishments long past this Veterans Day.

Rupert E. Phillips, CEO
John M. Flanagan, Editor & Publisher
David Shapiro, Managing Editor
Diane Yukihiro Chang, Senior Editor & Editorial Page Editor
Frank Bridgewater & Michael Rovner, Assistant Managing Editors
A.A. Smyser, Contributing Editor