The reason for the delay was the decision of elections officers to conduct a test in the middle of the count to ensure that the system was working properly and there would be no errors. In past elections audits were performed only before and after the count.
Chief elections officer Dwayne Yoshina explained that the Elections Office received undeserved criticism after the 1994 elections. The mid-count test was an attempt to forestall more such complaints. Instead, people are complaining that the returns were so late. It's never been this bad since the system was computerized.
One reason for the late results may be that those in charge are no longer elected officials. Governor Cayetano, who as lieutenant governor was responsible for elections, noted that in the past the lieutenant governors balanced the need to test the system against the importance of delivering election reports to the public as quickly as possible. Now, he said, "you have people who are not elected. They don't feel that particular compulsion, in my opinion."
OK, governor, but you're the boss now. Can't you light a fire under these election officials and get the results out? Is it really necessary to halt the count for hours to conduct a test when no one seriously questions the integrity of the system? Let's not go through this again on Nov. 5.
In fiscal 1994-95, 7,573 civil cases were filed in Circuit Court. Now the judiciary is pushing alternative dispute resolution in an attempt to unclog the courts and get more conflicts settled sooner. The Hawaii Supreme Court has adopted a rule that, effective Jan. 1, 1997, all parties involved in civil cases filed in Circuit Court must have a face-to-face meeting to consider settlement or alternative means of resolving the dispute.
ADR is no magic cure, but if properly administered it could help unclog the courts and relieve the frustrations of litigants. The state Supreme Court's new rule could have a profound effect on how Hawaii residents handle their disputes.
On Saturday Banharn promised to step down in seven days, after a suitable successor is found. The prime minister was forced to announce his resignation by some of the leaders of his six-party coalition government, in return for support on a parliamentary no-confidence vote. In the debate, opposition politicians accused Banharn of condoning corruption and economic mismanagement.
Thailand's economy has been booming but government mismanagement has taken a toll. The government's short-term debt rating was recently downgraded. Thailand's need for effective political leadership grows as the popular King Bhumibol Adulyadej ages but no relief is in sight.

Rupert E. Phillips, CEO
John M. Flanagan, Editor & Publisher
David Shapiro, Managing Editor
Diane Yukihiro Chang, Senior Editor & Editorial Page Editor
Frank Bridgewater & Michael Rovner, Assistant Managing Editors
A.A. Smyser, Contributing Editor