Letters to the Editor
Thursday, July 25, 1996


Private prisons should be a
community priority

Crime continues to spin wildly out of control and we can no longer take solace in the notion that our society is a safe haven ("Isle crime up; 4th worst in U.S.,'' Star-Bulletin, July 20).

Honolulu Police Chief Michael Nakamura is right when he says that we need more prison space and that it is high time to strongly consider a private prison that would not cost the state any start-up money.

Private prisons have a better record than state institutions in reducing recidivism and can normally save 10-14 percent in operating expenses. We also need to look at better managed half-way houses and more aggressively educate elementary school children about crime.

It is a fundamental duty of government - at all levels - to provide a physically safe environment for all. To achieve that end, we need to implement new ideas and launch new strategies now!

Bill Sharp



3 Council members
voted their conscience on camp

The constituents of Honolulu City Council members Donna Kim, Duke Bainum and Steve Holmes can be proud that their Council representatives did the noble and right thing, in the best interests of the people, by voting against the majority and in favor of saving Camp Kailua - a valuable cultural and social resource.

Shame on the other six and especially on my councilman, John Henry Felix, who did not represent me when he authored and voted for this bill. It now paves the way for destroying Camp Kailua, which served the handicapped, the elderly and the very young among the over 20,000 people per year who camped there.

Camp Kailua takes up a mere, out-of-the-way and insignificant three acres of Kailua Park. It's in nobody's way and nothing will be gained by destroying it.

However, much will be lost forever if the camp is destroyed.

Thank you, Mrs. Kim, Dr. Bainum and Mr. Holmes for having the wisdom and courage to vote your conscience. The citizenry can be proud!

Barbara Elm



Why aren't there any pageants for males?

I have a question for David J. Raymond (Letters, July 19). Why is it that "girls" are expected to strut and preen for their scholarships in contests like the Miss Hawaii Pageant, when there is no comparable bathing suit-talent-evening wear competition for "boys"?

Perhaps because:

a) Guys are taken more seriously (they would look really silly twirling a baton).

b) They have bazillions of other scholarship resources.

c) There is a limited market. Who has the time or desire to see hunks in contrived settings?

d) Sponsoring corporations are almost exclusively run by men. It is their interest to influence the perpetuation of beauty pageants and to continue a male-dictated ideal of what makes a woman beautiful.

Eve S. Morawski
Pearl City



Court helps guilty blame others for actions

Thanks for Diane Chang's great column on July 19, "Some nifty pointers to avoid getting sued."

It's always been a burr in my saddle - people's unwillingness to accept responsibility. That's bad enough but, when enablers like the Hawaii Supreme Court back them up, I want to scream.

Richard Sullivan
Los Angeles



Want to write a letter to the editor? Let all Star-Bulletin readers know what you think. Please keep your letter to about 200 words. You can send it by e-mail to letters@starbulletin.com or you can fill in the online form for a faster response. Or print it and mail it to: Letters to the Editor, P.O. Box 3080, Honolulu, Hawaii 96802. Or fax it to: 523-8509. Always be sure to include your daytime phone number.




Text Site Directory:
[News] [Business] [Features] [Sports] [Editorial] [Community] [Info] [Stylebook] [Feedback]