Letters to the Editor
Tuesday, June 25, 1996


Is there a secret report with
updated Barbers info?

The Star-Bulletin on June 9 carried an article on the proposed Kalaeloa (Barbers Point) General Aviation Airport. The state has pushed for a reliever airport for small planes so that Honolulu Airport can increase the number of tourists coming in.

Community representatives acquired and read every document referred to by the state. Each time the community representatives presented information from the state reports the state said the information was "outdated." This included state reports written in 1992, 1994, October 1995 and Vision 2010.

The state said that the true information would soon be available in a future publication. When asked by the community if it would agree to a covenant guaranteeing that the information would not be outdated upon publication, the state said, "We'll think about it."

It makes the public feel information from the government is unreliable. Does the state have a secret report?

Henry Q. Curtis
Executive Director
Life of the Land



Japanese tourists
would rather shop in Honolulu

There was some shoddy planning on the part of those who put together the direct flights to Kona from Tokyo.

It appears that the Japanese government and its air transportation department could have been too anxious. They didn't check on the potential and capabilities of the Big Island and, most important, they didn't interview their own people on what they desired in a dream vacation to Hawaii.

Now that the die has been cast, let's not leave Japanese tourists in Kona for five days and four nights. Instead, shuttle them to Honolulu for a couple of days and nights.

Shopping and more shopping is their principal objective in visiting Hawaii, in contrast to most tourists who want outer isle seclusion.

The Hawaii Visitors Bureau and visitor industry officials should interview departing Japanese tourists to verify my comments. Ideally, most of them would prefer to stay in Waikiki and fly to the outer islands for a day or overnight, and then return.

Toshio Chinen
Pearl City



Out-marriages do affect Hawaiian
blood quantum

Michael Haas claims the blood quantum of native Hawaiians is going up because part-Hawaiians are increasingly marrying other part-Hawaiians (Letters, June 18). The offspring of hapa-Hawaiians are, on average, hapa-Hawaiian. The same holds for any quantum.

If a woman's portion of Hawaiian blood is A and a man's is B, both the couple and their offspring are, on average, (A+B)/2 Hawaiian. Average blood quantum does not change from parents to children.

The average blood quantum of part-Hawaiians cannot increase unless part-Hawaiian couples who have more Hawaiian blood produce more offspring than those with less Hawaiian blood.

On the other hand, one child from a single out-marriage reduces the average blood quantum of part-Hawaiians.

As long as there are any out-marriages at all, a continual decline in Hawaiian blood quantum is nearly inevitable. Of course, the same is true for every other ethnic group that has out-marriages.

Lane Yoder
Kaneohe



Throw out the 'D' in our grading system

As thousands of public school students are engaging in summer fun, educators should be reevaluating their grading system.

Usually, grades are distributed as follows:

A is excellent or well above average, B is good or above average, C is satisfactory or average, D is unsatisfactory or below average, and F is failed or well below average.

Although some educators and parents feel that grades do not reflect the true measurement of a person's knowledge, they are an accurate assessment of a person's effort.

Thus, why should we incorporate the "D" in our grading system?

If a student's effort is below satisfactory, then it is unsatisfactory. Unsatisfactory effort should not be "rewarded" with a passing grade.

Thus, A, B, C and F should be the only letter grades earned by students.

Usually in the business world, unsatisfactory work is "rewarded" with a pink slip.

Should we be teaching our leaders of tomorrow that unsatisfactory effort is permissible?

The answer is unequivocally NO!

Wil Beaver



Want to write a letter to the editor? Let all Star-Bulletin readers know what you think. Please keep your letter to about 200 words. You can send it by e-mail to letters@starbulletin.com or you can fill in the online form for a faster response. Or print it and mail it to: Letters to the Editor, P.O. Box 3080, Honolulu, Hawaii 96802. Or fax it to: 523-8509. Always be sure to include your daytime phone number.




Text Site Directory:
[News] [Business] [Features] [Sports] [Editorial] [Community] [Info] [Stylebook] [Feedback]